c0atimundi:

everlasting-contrast:

newszin:

The Columbine Shooters, Downstage Center

“On three,” one of the boys says. His voice reeks of determination. The bright blond spikes of his hair stand out against a long coat, pants, and heavy-duty boots, all of them black.  

“I… I… Okay,” says his partner, distraught under his own black garb.

Above them, a constellation of illuminated backpacks dangles from the ceiling, hanging over cafeteria tables ensconced in shadows.

“Eric Harris’s ‘Guns in School’ essay,” the first reads, drifting away from the scene to recall an assignment, which along with journal entries and poems the two have returned to throughout the play, moving nimbly between reality and introspection. “More and more we hear of shooting sprees and rampages on the news,” he says. “Almost any school shooting can be prevented in some way or another, we just have to spend the necessary time and money to figure out how.”

“What’d you get on it?”

“A 92.”

Moments later the shooters begin counting. The room goes dark. The audience knows what happened next.

The Erlkings, a play written by Nathaniel Sam Shapiro, depicts onstage the infamous shooters, Eric Harris and Dylan Klebold, who on April 20, 1999, killed 13 people and wounded more than 20 others at Columbine High School before committing suicide. Theirs was one of the deadliest shootings in U.S. history.

The off-Broadway play, directed by Saheem Ali, is based on an FBI report—a nearly 1,000-page compendium of the boys’ own writings and other evidence—as well as additional sources, like the many home videos Harris and Klebold made. It opens Sunday at the Beckett Theatre after a week of preview performances, with Em Grosland and James Scully in the leading roles.

In his playwright’s statement, Shapiro says he began researching Columbine after the December 2012 school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, and calls Columbine a “watershed moment” for those, like him, who were students in American schools at the time. 

“The way we talked about Adam [Lanza] took me back to Eric and Dylan: these were ‘monsters’ and ‘no one could understand how they could do something like this,’” Shapiro writes. He says he pursued the play because “we will never prevent another Columbine by distancing ourselves from those who would perpetrate such an act and by refusing, out of fear, to understand them.”

James Scully as Dylan Klebold and Em Grosland as Eric Harris, preparing pipe bombs in The Erlkings. Carol Rosegg

Criticism from Columbine families

When Coni Sanders first caught wind of the project from a segment on the radio, she says she was shocked.

“He’s granting the wishes of these two boys who murdered my family,” says Sanders, whose father, William “Dave” Sanders, was a business teacher and coach at the school, the only staff member killed in the shootings. “I truly feel that he should have omitted the killers’ names.” Sanders published a strongly-worded op-ed about the play in the New York Post in early November that grew out of a post she had written on Facebook.

One of Harris and Klebold’s objectives was to be remembered forever, she says, and shooters after them have followed suit in an attempt to gain fame and notoriety. So putting Harris and Klebold onstage as Shapiro has, Sanders says, is not only “giving them exactly what they wanted,” but could also glorify their actions and encourage others to do the same. In the case of the Virginia Tech shootings, she says, “the boy that killed their families idolized the boys that killed my family.”

After Columbine, Sanders became a forensic therapist, working with felons convicted of violent crimes and the mentally ill, “to better understand how Dylan and Eric got to where they are.” “I don’t see Eric and Dylan as monsters,” she says. “I see them as two boys who were broken.”

Shapiro insists that his play is meant to educate and prompt discussion rather than to glorify, and that the real-world scenario will help audiences connect to the issue. 

“I don’t think Eric and Dylan would be so proud to see this play because it shows their humiliation, it shows their vulnerability,” he says, adding that the play highlights how Columbine is a more complex story than people would like to admit.

Peter Langman, a psychologist and scholar whose research focuses on school shooters, tells Newsweek: “My concern is that it might portray Harris and Klebold somehow as disaffected contemporary youth rather than portraying them as extreme psychological outliers.” While Klebold was slipping deep into a severe depression and exhibiting signs of schizotypal personality disorder, Langman says, Harris “was a very disturbed person, a psychopath.

“This is someone who admired Hitler and the Nazis. This is someone who had fantasies of raping girls he knew. This is someone who fantasized about mutilating human bodies and enjoying it. So he was not an ordinary kid, he was not just an innocent victim of the students who teased him.” Langman, who wrote the book Why Kids Kill: Inside the Minds of School Shooters, says “Eric Harris no more represents his generation than Charles Manson represented his.”

James Scully as Dylan Klebold (left) and Em Grosland as Eric Harris (right). Carol Rosegg

Based on Columbine

Shapiro is certainly not the first to draw on Columbine for art, or to attract criticism for doing so. Many others have based films, books, and even a video game on the event in Colorado, which while not the first school shooting, remains etched in the nation’s collective memory for the scale of destruction Harris and Klebold wrought.

The long list of previous films related to Columbine includes Michael Moore’s documentary, Bowling for Columbine; the play-turned-movie Bang Bang You’re Dead; the film Elephant; and a parody movie titled Duck! The Carbine High Massacre. A video game called Super Columbine Massacre RPG! sparked outrage after it was released on April 20, 2005, exactly six years after the shootings.

Another play, columbinus, written by P.J. Paparelli and Stephen Karam for The United States Theater Project, premiered in 2005. Unlike The Erlkings, columbinus—which is a mixture of fact and fiction—focuses on the victims as well. In the rampage scene in columbinus, Harris and Klebold are turned away from the audience. “We didn’t want it to be about them,” Paparelli told the Boston Globe last fall before a 10-show run opened in Boston.

In The Erklings, Shapiro consciously decided to leave out the actual shootings.

“That’s the part we know,” says Ali, the show’s director. “The part we don’t know is what happened the year before.”

Salli Garrigan was a junior at Columbine High School when Harris and Klebold opened fire. She was in the soundproof choir room when she and her classmates saw other students running outside through the windows. She managed to make it through the auditorium as the fire alarm rang and the sound of ricocheting bullets reached her ears from another part of the school. In the main hall, glass from the doors shattered in front of her before a teacher pointed her toward another route to safety.

Garrigan, who worked in theater in New York before recently moving to Washington, D.C., says on the fence about the idea of The Erlkings. She found out about the play when she saw an audition notice.

“It looks like the playwright was really touched by the Columbine shootings and wanted to write directly about it,” Garrigan tells Newsweek. “[But] since it’s from the eye of both Eric and Dylan, I feel like the play might enhance the problem even more.”

Her ambivalence, she says, is uncommon among those with a personal connection to Columbine. “There is a lot of uproar in the Columbine community,” Garrigan says, adding that “sometimes art can be therapy.”

Even Sanders concedes that theater is “a fantastic medium for people to understand and feel the emotions around [Columbine].” “I respect what [the playwright] is doing,” she says. “I just don’t respect how he’s going about it.”

James Scully as Dylan Klebold and Em Grosland as Eric Harris with Reynaldo Piniella (camera) and Matthew Bretschneider in The Erlkings. Carol Rosegg

The shootings problem

In the decade and a half since Columbine, the United States has seen an increase in active shooter incidents, and news of school violence is all too frequent. Just this year, there have been shootings at Reynolds High School in Oregon, at the University of California, Santa Barbara, at Marysville Pilchuck High School in Washington, and at several more colleges and universities as well as middle and high schools.

According to Langman, most adolescents who are en route to committing a middle- or high-school shooting leave warning signs, which he refers to as “leakage.” A prospective gunman might “leak” his intentions by making direct threats, telling a friend to stay away on a certain day, or with other hints.

“It’s a matter of the people who hear or see them knowing they’re warning signs and knowing what to do about them,” Langman tells Newsweek. Langman runs training sessions for professionals in education and law enforcement on recognizing and handling warning signs.

Ultimately, Shapiro says, that’s the goal of the play as well.

“What we would like an audience to come away with is that these are preventable,” he says. “And it’s so much more powerful because of who said it, especially as he was plotting it,” referring to Harris’s ‘Guns in School’ essay, which closes the play.

The Erlkings—named for German poem Die Erlkönige, whiich Harris once made a note to himself to memorize—eschews a linear chronology for a more fluid structure. Toward the end of the first act, after Harris and Klebold’s classmates have lobbed cafeteria food and squeezed ketchup all over them, Harris once again drifts outside of the action to recite the note he would one day leave for the police.

“Don’t blame my family. They didn’t know. It’s not their fault. They brought me up just fucking fine,” he reads, telling police not to blame the school or the stores that sold him ammunition. “Just because we went on a killing spree doesn’t mean everyone else will.”

NoYesYescolumbine, shooters, downstage, centerWebWhitelistEMEAUSHeadline Image Full Height http://www.newsweek.com/columbine-shooters-downstage-center-284747

Given that the school shooting trend has become a common occurrence, this play is even more relevant than Columbinus. A bold move focusing on the shooters inner world which is of key importance in regards to the mental heal issues that are vaguely talked about each time a shooting occurs but then never seem to get addressed since we’re too busy vilifying the shooters and brushing, oopsy!, yet another one under the carpet.

“He says he pursued the play because “we will never prevent another Columbine by distancing ourselves from those who would perpetrate such an act and by refusing, out of fear, to understand them.”

^This.

I’ve never understood the logic behind the “Never say their names, never show their picture, never talk about them, never study them, never try to understand them, never try to figure out why they did it, never see them as human beings.” crowd; they might as well be saying “I don’t want to understand them even if it would help prevent shootings and save lives.”

Imagine if we treated preventable medical conditions the way we did shootings; waiting until you had a heart attack before giving you medical attention, and then only with a defibrillator rather than examining/studying/discussing the underlying issues/causes of the problem.

Also, the argument that talking about shooters or showing their pictures or saying their names is what’s going to make somebody decide to throw away their entire life and future, assemble an arsenal of killing utensils, and murder, maim and destroy as many other people as humanly possible is beyond ridiculous, and to me, says a lot about how resistant people are to trying to understand shooters and their motives.

It’s always said that people who want to commit shootings are going to do whatever it takes, that they are motivated and determined, that no amount of gun laws can stop them, but at the same time, they’re apparently so gullible and easily influenced that their motivation to overcome all these monumental obstacles and sacrifice their lives and the lives of others is because they saw James Holmes’ mugshot on CNN and want 5 minutes of “”“fame”“”?

We treat shooters like mysterious boogeymen; we say “If only he hadn’t played [insert violent video game] and listened to [insert “dark”, “subversive” music group] this never would have happened!”, and view them as inhuman, un-relatable, alien, monsters whose motives are incomprehensible. The thing is, their motives CAN be understood, if their writings were analyzed and discussed, if people were actually invested in truly understanding why they did it, they could find out, or at least come close. But a lot of people don’t actually want to understand what motivates shooters, they’re invested in their ignorance and will fight to maintain the mysterious ‘boogeymen’ illusion, as it creates an information vacuum where any postulated BS is considered equally plausible. Notice how many people still say Eric and Dylan went around asking everyone if they believe in god before shooting them, that Cassie said “yes” and Rachel said “You know I do”, despite all the overwhelming evidence to the contrary. These people don’t want the truth, they don’t want themselves or anyone else to actually know E+D’s real motives, they get to affirm their confirmation bias, skew how the shooting was reported, manipulate and police the grieving process, wallow in self pity, and cast themselves as targeted, oppressed and righteous victims and wring out those lies tightly for years on end to get every last drop of precious BS false victimhood to spread propaganda and attract new recruits.

When the shooters are not discussed/analyzed and we don’t try to understand their motives, it makes it so anyone can put forth some pet BS explanation, and in this information vacuum, this BS is elevated in importance. People can suggest that the shooter did it because; “prayer isn’t taught in school”, “gay people can get married”, “vaccines”, “OBAMA!!11!” or any number of BS reasons that wouldn’t stick as well as they do if the truth was actually valued. (Note: if these BS postulations don’t stick and aren’t widely adopted, the next step is to throw ones hands up and flip the monopoly board over and cry “CONSPIRUHCY!!!” [It’s invariably attributed to communists or Jewish people.])

Anyway, back to my first point; *we need to recognize that shooters don’t just “snap” one day and go on a killing rampage for no reason, *that understanding shooters and their motives can help us prevent shootings, *that analyzing and discussing shooters/motives does not mean an endorsement of mass murder or glorification of murderers and that talking about shooters does not cause people to snap. Shootings can be prevented before they happen and that’s where we should focus our energy rather than just waiting until bullets start flying and trying to minimize the damage. Perhaps most important is that we need to recognize that the person who is most likely to, and most capable of preventing a shooting is the person contemplating one.

Well spoken additional commentary from c0atimundi tagged on to mine. Truth^^. So, reblogging this again..